The ability to write reviews competently speaks of your high professionalism in a particular area. In the article, you will find all the necessary information about writing movie reviews and get acquainted with an example.
What is a movie review?
A movie review is a short publication that contains a description of a particular movie. The review should include the personal impressions and emotions of the author.
How to write a movie review?
Such a review covers the author’s impression and expert analysis, not only of the movie itself but also of the work of the actors, director, screenwriter, etc. That’s why this task, such as “do my homework assignment”, can be rather complicated to deal with. In such situations, it is better to get assistance from the essay helper. A writer who has already written numerous movie reviews will provide you with a high-quality sample.
Here are some tips on how to write a movie review:
- An intriguing headline that should grab attention.
- The introduction is 2-3 sentences, which are the basis for further analysis.
- A brief summary of the plot. Here you can focus on the strengths or weaknesses of the plot twists and turns, giving only a superficial understanding of the movie. Approximately it consists of 5-8 sentences.
- Movie analysis. Analyze the relevance and originality of the plot, the depth of disclosure of the idea embodied in it, and the characters of the heroes, if possible, compare with similar movies on this topic. Write about how the actors managed to get used to the role and convey the essence of the author’s intention and how successful the script, staging, and presentation of the material are. Rate the scenery, special effects, camera work, etc. The volume is about 20 sentences.
- Your own impressions and conclusions. These are 4-5 sentences that should summarize all of the above and stem from your analysis.
Example of a movie review
Most often, students face difficulties in writing reviews. Each university may have its own specific requirements for the format, but all of them must comply with the framework of the review style.
As an example, we offer a review of a “Life Like” movie. Pay special attention to the aspects that the reviewer must certainly touch on in the analysis.
“Life Like” movie review sample
Josh Janowicz’s directorial debut, “Life Like,” is able to tell through a fantasy drama about overcoming problems in family life and reinforcing the psychological and erotic sides of the narrative with the help of the artificial intelligence of the robot.
The director offers his own view on the concept of “Ex Machina” by Alex Garland and builds a film about the sublimations of a young wife bored in a big house (Addison Timlin, “Fallen,” “Girl in the Box”), who is obsessed with progressive ideas and personal stereotypes, and her husband (Drew Van Acker, “Spy Intervention,” “Last Survivors”), who became the head of a large company after the death of his father.
It’s hard to deny Janowicz’s good taste and desire to build a very peculiar love triangle thriller under the surface of the ideal setting of a large country house, where the third is an android robot (Stephen Strait, “The Covenant”).
The director unexpectedly builds a classic scheme about rivals who fight for the heart of Timlin’s heroine in a bisexual vein when he operates with the psychological frustrations of the main characters and allows them to speak openly with the character of Strait as with a living mirror, trusting him not only with the most intimate thoughts but also with subconscious fears and desires.
To a greater extent, Janowicz concentrates on humanistic ideas and goes against expectations when he deprives the android of all cunning and makes him a sensual empathic mannequin that, like a sponge, absorbs the emotions of its owners and causes them, thanks to their constant desire to please, real paranoia along with obscene desires.
In the director’s interpretation, such a useful and obedient owner of a flexible intellect and a perfect body as the hero of Strait becomes a kind of Trojan horse and a bone of contention for a young couple who are going through difficult times and therefore seeking solace along with a high-tech toy.
From the very beginning, “Life Like” by Janowicz clashes rational and intuitive things, dreams, and pragmatism, male and female, to create conflict in the seemingly perfect relationship between Sophie (Addison Timlin) and James (Drew Van Acker).
They obviously received a good education, but they prefer not to work in an office but to restore furniture rubbish found somewhere and exist on the money of the father of the hero Acker, who sends good money to his only son every month.
However, James’s father suddenly leaves this world, and the couple moves to a family home outside the city. There, Sophie turns into a strange housewife who, based on her own principles, fires all the servants in the house and is left alone with numerous household problems.
At this time, Acker’s character in the chair of the head of the company promotes his innovative ideas about environmental technologies, which do not meet with enthusiastic support among top management.
In Timlin’s imagination, Sophie becomes an idealist who languishes in the trap of a huge mansion and hardly understands how to fix her life. But at the same time, she symbolically gives her husband “Great Expectations” by Dickens to once again emphasize the belief in pure ideals that no longer find confirmation in real life.
Unexpectedly for himself, Janowicz finds himself inside one of the most important modern trends. He openly speaks with the help of his characters about what excessive trust in the cold mind of machines and the creation of personal attachments to helpful robots can lead to, which, during operation, can develop both flexible sexual skills and philosophical views on the structure of the world and the role of the Creator in it.
Therefore, “Life Like” has a distinct double semantic bottom and is interested in the dynamics of marital roughness through a very conventional science fiction prism.
