Nick De Semlyenโs informative book โWild and Crazy Guysโ ostensibly has the same goal as Jason Reitmanโs “Saturday Night”: fleshing out the legends that shaped the landscape of American comedy for decades to come, beginning with the hectic birth of the seemingly immortal sketch comedy show โSaturday Night Live.โ But De Semlyenโs own analysis of the field doesnโt begin right at the beginning; the prologue of his book opens not with a play-by-play of the moments leading to SNLโs first episode, but rather an infamous moment in the showโs second season, in which new troupe member Bill Murray got into a backstage fistfight with former cast superstar (and then-host) Chevy Chase, mere moments before the episode went live.
With one simple anecdote, De Semlyen lays the foundation for a potent examination of the chaos and lacking professionalism that made this era of comedy so refreshing, and equally as volatile. Reitmanโs loving tribute to the moment in which his own father Ivanโs best friends would stake their claim as the torch-bearers of American yucks makes its own effort to capture that acidityโand subsequently prove why it made this moment so great and โrevolutionaryโโbut in his efforts, the genuine affection he holds for all those behind the lights and lenses obscures his vision in the face of trying to parse out why this story needs to be told at all.
On paper, if any approach would seem feasible for making a tribute film on the inception of SNL, then “Saturday Night” has the right idea: a bottled-up, lighting-paced observation piece captured in real-time leading up to the airing of the first episode. Itโs the 11th of October 1975, and Lorne Michaels (Gabriel LaBelle, doing his best to infuse authority and slick-talking charm into a role clearly made for someone 10 years older) is on the verge of historyโat least, thatโs the way he puts it to anyone who dares to doubt him. In 90 minutes, the first episode of โSaturday Nightโ (hold the โLiveโ) will air, and NBC will have Michaels to thank for handing them the keys to the next half-century of comedy.
That is if anything can go smoothly. But, in order for us to have a movie, the floors of Studio 8H are rampant with calamityโto the filmโs credit, most of it documented in some form as fact. The showโs lighting setup is a disaster, the three-hour dress rehearsal has yet to be trimmed down to a 90-minute script, and half the crew is either openly against the entire concept of the show or verging on setting the building ablaze in order to escape a disaster whose reason for being they canโt even comprehend.
The thing is, however, that Reitman and co-writer Gil Kenan donโt seem to have any idea what makes SNL important, either; they know, like the rest of us, that the show would go on to make sketch comedy a viable form of entertainment and launch nearly every comedian weโve known and loved since the mid-โ70s (save for my Canadian brethren over at SCTV!), but they canโt seem to quantify that value enough to justify more than 90 minutes of โDiCaprio pointing meme.โ
Even for someone as deeply invested in the lore of this show and its subsequent exports as yours truly, “Saturday Night” can only take its genuine devotion towards these misfits so far before Iโm left to ask what weโre actually doing hereโif SNL left such an inescapable stamp on the medium, then the least the film could do is convince us as much without having Michaels blatantly say it every 15 seconds.
Some would say, then, that Reitman was simply the wrong person to tackle the tale of this mythic evening, as any man who grew up around half of the filmโs subjects as friends of the family is likely too close to the material to actually dissect it in any meaningful or objective way. Every obnoxious and uninspired long take seems to prove as muchโbecause how else will we indicate the chaos of a frantic set without gliding into each room to hear one punchline at a time?
To play devilโs advocate, though, Reitmanโs warmth towards the cast of the film serves “Saturday Night” quite well, in that his respect for these comedy giants actually finds him putting them at a distance, giving the original Not Quite Ready For Primetime Players the space to make a mark without forcing his actors to come across like theyโre merely there to do an impression of people famous for doing impressions.
To that end, the cast of Saturday Night is nothing short of immaculate, both in casting and execution. Every one of the original seven castmates (no room for George Coe, apparently) is envisioned with a pitch-perfect understanding of each of those performersโ strengthsโfrom Dylan OโBrien absolutely nailing Dan Aykroydโs motor-mouthed businessman shtick, to Kim Matula embodying Jane Curtinโs flip-switch supermodel stoicismโwhile even the bit players are given a chance to shine; each second of Nicholas Podany as Billy Crystal feels like looking into a different kind of crystal, sucking you right back into that hallway just outside the studio.
Unfortunately, while Reitmanโs love for the cast and the process is palpable, “Saturday Night” still has a tendency towards reverence in both of those areas that mucks the supposedly acerbic atmosphere that the film is attempting to depict. Itโs unlikely that a conversation actually took place between Michaels, John Belushi (Matt Wood), and Gilda Radner (Ella Hunt) at the skating rink just outside the NBC building mere minutes before the episode aired.
And while the moment feels like a fitting tribute to the two castmates who would never get to see their stars shine as brightly or for as long as they deserved, this scene more or less signals a continued downward spiral for the last 15 minutes of the film, in which all justification comes down to โItโs important because you already know it is.โ (Did we really need a schmaltzy โcome togetherโ moment in which Chevy freaking Chase of all people is there helping the crew set up in the final minutes before airtime?)
Was Jason Reitman the wrong person to direct “Saturday Night”? Iโd hesitate to outright say as much, but he was certainly the wrong person to write the film, as its need to get to the heart of the assholes who made it to air requires someone who understands both the rhythm of such a contained piece and the psychology required to make the balance of likeability work. Perhaps Aaron Sorkin has strayed too far from anything genuinely biting to even touch a script so convinced of its own radicalism, but then again, the script Reitman and Kenan gave us doesnโt really make the case for that state of affairs, either.