You either die a hero or live long enough to become the person recommending a Kartik Aaryan movie to everyone.ย I was returning home from the most soul-filling dinner when my brother texted to ask if I wanted to watch โChandu Champion.โ I ignored his message. Why would I pay to watch a Kartik Aaryan film? Although I wasnโt paying (what else is the point of having a sibling?), you get the point. He called me then, repeating the question. I still didnโt want to watch it, but I asked for a minute to make my decision. I was torn up.
You must be thinking: Itโs just a movie, whatโs the big deal? But no movie is ever just a movie (this one wasnโt either). So, I agreed to go purely out of fear of missing out. What else was I to do? Stay up late while my family watches a Kartik Aaryan film and wait for them to come home? Of course not. I hadnโt seen the trailer or the poster, was blissfully unaware of any marketing, and knew nothing about the film except that it was some sort of biopic, Kabir Khan directed it, and, of course, that Kartik Aaryan was in it.
The film opens with a prosthetically older Kartik arriving at a police station on a bus. A constable runs to inform the Inspector (played by Shreyas Talpade) that a man wants to file a case against the President of India. Like Shreyas Talpade, I also thought, โWhat a joke! I was right; I shouldnโt have come.โ Placing numerous medals on the desk, the old man is Murlikant Petkar, an ex-athlete who wants to sue the President of India for not awarding him the Arjuna Award. No, itโs not a greedy gripe of old-age recognition. Murlikant believes this will draw attention to his village, so it is finally on the receiving end of development, including roads, electricity, sanitation, and such.
But nobody knows who this old man is. Who is Murlikant Petkar? Great question because, like everyone at the police station, the audience doesnโt know who Murlikant is either. In many ways, that is the point of a biopic. To deep-dive into the life of someone weโre familiar with, someone whom weโve heard of but donโt know about. However, the bigger challenge for Kabir Khan here was to introduce this unknown man to us and solidify his identity while ensuring that the absurd happenings of his real life donโt get lost as fictional creative freedoms for dramatic purposes.
And he does an efficient job of it. Murlikant Petkar becomes the narrator of his story. Khan has turned protagonists into narrators before – a reluctant one in โNew Yorkโ and an eager one in โBajrangi Bhaijaan.โ However, here, the narrator is neither reluctant nor naive but rather resigned. Someone who must prove that his demand is not untoward, someone who finally has a stage to tell the story of his life.
Watching an Olympian return to his village with a bronze medal solidifies one dream in young Murli (played by Ayan Khan). He wants to win the first Olympic Gold Medal for India. This is the one goal of his life. But there are other things he would like: not to be laughed at, not to be called โChanduโ (loser), and not to be ridiculed for his ridiculous dream. His elder brother, Jagannath Petkar, supports his absurd dream. Teenage Murli is a pehelwaanโs apprentice and, despite his fatherโs disapproval, participates in a local, friendly wrestling match in which he defeats an influential manโs son. This win quickly infuriates the villagers, and Murli has to run, jump, and swim away from his village, away from his home, and onto the first passing train to escape the wrath of the mob, ready to kill him.
On the train, he meets Garnail Singh (Bhuvan Arora), who nudges Murli to join him in the army if he wants to play sports for India. The first act, for me, ends with the song โSatyanaasโ. On their way to joining the army corps, this song marks the end of these boys’ adolescence and innocence. Kabir Khan has mentioned that it was his boyish smile that first drew him to casting Kartik. Heโs not wrong. Kartikโs innocence here leaps and latches onto you – his charm is unflinching.
Despite music being the filmโs weakest link, โSatyanaasโ is shot brilliantly, with yellow hues filtering into the train and signaling the start of a new dawn, a new hope, and a new world. The light wraps itself around Murli, also giving us one of my favorite frames from the film: the boys silhouetted atop the train like a Warli painting. Cinematographer Sudeep Chatterjee has captured Kartik Aaryan in a light unlike ever before. As Murli transitions from wrestling to boxing and the games proceed, the camera is decidedly infatuated with him.
Here, we meet Coach Tiger (Vijay Raaz), Murlikantโs mentor and longest companion. Only a few pull off humor with a permanently annoyed face like Vijay Raaz. Under his watchful eyes, Murli transitions from being a boy to a man, from merely harboring dreams to actionably fulfilling them. He is set to compete at the upcoming Asian Games but never gets to go for the 1965 India-Pakistan War onsets in Kashmir, where Petkar is stationed. Kartik is known for his monologues, but Kabir Khan trades that for an 8-minute uncut war sequence here, which I was so mesmerized by I didnโt even notice it was eight minutes long.
I was so mesmerized that I never anticipated that the male lead of a mainstream Hindi film would get shot nine times and, more importantly, return physically disabled. The truth is that a Bollywood (or Tollywood) hero would recover unscathed from such a grave injury, but Murlikant Petkar is not a Bollywood hero. He is a real person. A soldier-cum-athelete who loses all function of his limbs because of a bullet lodged in his spine, where it remains to date. Murlikant Petkar is disabled by the age of 21 and remains so for the rest of his life.
When Murli is moved to the army hospital for better care, his long-lost family finally learns of his whereabouts. Knowing that her paraplegic son might never walk ever again, his mother promises to nurse Murli to take care of him, and he agrees to finally return home despite his incomplete dream. Murli lets go of all resolve and breaks down, and while enduring this phase of pain, Kartikโs performance truly shines. This tearful reunion is followed by, in my opinion, the most brutal scene between Murli and his brother Jagannath (Aniruddh Dave). As the two look out into the sea, the sun sets on Murliโs slivering hope.
Jagannath makes some logical arguments that their old mother and his growing family will not be able to accommodate him. I know that heโs right – in no world would their care compete with the hospitalโs – but my heart shattered for Murli. Brothers are supposed to pay for something as trivial as your cinema tickets. Theyโre not supposed to leave you by the sea, family-less. At least, thatโs what I used to believe. But brothers also have responsibilities, and the most challenging part of growing up is outgrowing your family. Kartik and Aniruddh play this out delicately, with equal restraint and intimacy.
The film structurally intercuts between the past and the present, where the police officers are deeply engrossed in Murlikantโs story but canโt help him without corroborating it. Enter Sonali Kulkarni, a reporter enamored by Murlikantโs story and shouldered with fact-checking. The filmโs supporting cast elevates most scenes, and Kartik is along with them. Much of the comedic relief also comes from them: Shreyas Talpade, Yashpal Yadav, Vijay Raaz, and Rajpal Yadav, who single-handedly balances the grimness in the second half. I had seen Kartik and Rajpal Yadav in โBhool Bhulaiyaa 2.โ
Yes, the film was funny in that it successfully made me scoff. In fact, nothing got a bigger laugh than when Kiara Advani, enticing Kartik into accompanying her to Rajasthan, said: “Humare yahan ka dal baati churma bhi bohat famous hai” and Kartik Aaryan said: “Acha? Khaaya toh nahi hai maine” and this kid seated next to me loudly said: โAur kachori bhi nahi?” All this is to say that Iโve never considered Kartik a comedic actor. I have despised him in comedies. But โChandu Championโ never offended me or anyone else in the audience, and still made me laugh with it and never once at it.
Another small cameo comes from Brijendra Kala, who plays a prisoner in custody at the police station. Watching him nudge Murliโs narration ahead reminded me of another film, also starring Brijendra Kala, about a soldier-turned-sportsman who was ignored by his country, whose laurels were lost in the dust, who was denied help despite bringing fame to the nation, and who turned from being a respectable sportsman to the notorious bandit Paan Singh Tomar.
โPaan Singh Tomarโ is a distinguished commentary about an infamous player and the terrible, avoidable hands he was dealt. So it isnโt astounding that our country was unaware of Murlikant Petkar’s existence and achievements, making โChandu Championโ all the more important. This biopic is not made to be touted as inspirational. It is made simply to tell a tale that was otherwise lost to time and indifference.
Bhagyashriโs research reveals thereโs still more to the story. As Murliโs first supporter tears himself away, his first mentor returns. Tiger reminds Murli that all is not lost. He reminds him that an athlete cannot give up: โAsli jeet woh hoti hai jab tum uss awaaz ko harate ho jo tumhe roz bolti hai ki tum pehle se hi haar chuke ho.โ This rings all the more true for a paraplegic against whom the odds lie stacked to tumble. Not only must Murli learn to swim his hands alone, but he also needs to swim as fast as other Olympians. He must convince the sports committee and state machinery in his favor, which doesnโt invest in sports persons with disabilities. Somehow, Murli makes it to the 1972 Summer Paralympics in Germany, where more battles lie ahead.
Halfway through writing this article, I realized that I have only seen four of Kartikโs movies, all of them at the cinemas and all of which I was bullied into watching: โSonu Ke Titu Ki Sweetyโ (by my family), โPati Patni Aur Wohโ (by my best friend) and โBhool Bhulaiyaa 2โ (by my love for Tabu). Even as a teenager, I could see through the disfiguring, hateful, and overused caricature โSonu Ke Titu Ki Sweetyโ had made of women.
It villainised the girl to show the unbreakable friendship between two men (make a distasteful parallel to โChallengers,โ if you will). All the while, I kept thinking: โIf not his money, this Titu guy has nothing to offer. What else did he, like most Indian men, bring to the table if not money?โ Whatโs wrong with being a gold-digger in an arranged marriage system that is hell-bent on breaking a womanโs spirit and crippling her to become the man and familyโs subject?
While there are multitudes who like the film, it is characters like these have tarnished Kartik Aaryan for people like me. Iโm glad, then, that this film has no romantic angle, no female figure whose purpose is to either push the man forward, hold him back, or simply die. Iโm sure Petkar must have experienced love, companionship, and all those nice things our movies sell us, but his story was more than love. To put it in a better way, his love was more than romantic.
He loved himself into ambition, into bravery, into freedom, into fighting for himself over and over again even when nobody else did. All this without ever being hateful of his disability. No, Iโm not saying that the film presents a positive, heroic portrayal of disability that only serves its erasure. Iโm saying that at no point does it make disability feel abnormal. Petkar is an athlete who believes he has lost everything, his dream, and his purpose, with the loss of movement in his legs. Yet he loves himself and loves his dream into starting afresh as a paraplegic and finishing it.
Watching Murlikant make it to the final round and swim past his ghosts is like watching an Indian Sysyphus who knows but one thing: to never give up. Again, the swimming sequences are shot with beauty and might – the camera really, really loves Kartik.
In telling Murlikant Petkarโs story, Kabir Khan puts disabled persons at the center stage, whose stories either donโt exist or are told pitifully. In reality, although the Arjuna Award has a Parasports category, Murlikant Petkar was denied it on the grounds that he was disabled (via The New Indian Express). The film blatantly displays the importance of representation in the birth of Murliโs dream as a child. A dream thatโs refueled by watching an older Dara Singh, Murli’s self-proclaimed first guru, still fighting in the rink. The film also casts actual paralympian swimmers to compete against Murli, enriching the intent and politics of Kabir Khanโs storytelling.
Before Murli receives treatment at the army hospital, he remains unconscious for two years. Upon waking up, heโs convinced that heโs in Pakistan, but a single look at the Indian flag soothes his anxiety. Kabir Khanโs films cross either end of the India-Pakistan debate. In โEk Tha Tiger,โ he shows that two hyper-ardent and loyal spies from both countries choose to prioritize love. In โBajrangi Bhaijaan,โ a hyper-religious and patriotic commoner foregoes all societal norms and dogma to bring a little Pakistani girl home.
However, in โPhantomโ (released in the same year as โBajrangiโ), a super-ambitious operation eliminates all those involved in the 26/11 terror attack, placing justice in the hands of a covert team. The writer-director has dwindled across extreme approaches. โPatriotismโ in โChandu Championโ comes from the sport, but Murliโs story is more than about nationalist pride. It is more than winning medals for a nation that forgets its players. It is about taking care of those people whom thousands of us entrust with our dreams and hopes, and it is about sheltering dreams and chasing them with singular dedication.
Watching Murli run away from home, fighting over and over and over again, I was convinced that no greatness can be achieved unless one dares to leave a home that holds you back, that doesnโt let your dream, that doesnโt let you move beyond your own station. One must. If nothing else, this film is about recognizing the Chandu in you and never letting them die.
Do I like Kartik Aaryan now? Maybe. Would I say watch the movie despite him? No. But would I say watch the film because of him? Absolutely, yes.