The Nightmare in Cinema

‘The Nightmare’ by Henry Fuseli is a household name among art connoisseurs. Such is the notoriety of this Gothic masterpiece that it needs no introduction. In this painting, a lady is sleeping with an incubus crouched atop her chest. A mare (horse), supposedly vehicle of an incubus, is witnessing the whole act. The painting derives its roots from folklore, referring to evil spirits who descend upon sleeping persons. What does it imply? The interpretations of its hidden symbolism run the gamut from the sexual struggle to sleep paralysis. But true genius lies in its structure rather than its implications.

The Nightmare 1
The Nightmare by Henry Fuseli

“The visual image is the common denominator of cinema and painting, and indeed many filmmakers have used the imagery of paintings to shape or to enrich the meaning of their films.”

-Angela Dalle Vacche

‘The Nightmare’ has preliminarily three elements:

  • Incubus: The oppressor

In Apocalypse Now Col. Kurtz spoke of Horror with a face. Perhaps that’s what Incubus is. At first glance, it looks like a lecherous imp, imposing his sexual fantasies upon unsuspecting wench; however, his true intentions remain speculative.

  • Woman: The oppressed

The posture of sleeping woman reflects her condition, her vulnerability, her impotency, her emptiness. There is also a hint of sexual repressiveness.

  • Horse: The observer

What is art without an observer? The role of the horse is often neglected, but it is indeed the key element of the painting.

Let’s call this structure Fuseli’s Nightmarish Triangle. Sounds cool right? The oscillation between three focal points creates a strange dynamic and makes ‘The Nightmare’ truly nightmarish. With time, Fuseli’s perverse art has gained cult status and emerged as an icon of horror. The sheer terror of its imagery and ambiguity of its theme leaves viewers baffled and intrigued at the same time. It has influenced almost every form of art; cinema is no exception. 

Here are three movies that heavily draw inspiration from “The Nightmare”:

1. Gothic [1986] | Ken Russell

The Nightmare 2

Ken Russell is perhaps the first filmmaker to re-stage ‘The Nightmare’. In disguise of a movie, ‘Gothic’ seems more like a series of twisted visuals loosely stitched together. With its surreal imagery, excessiveness and inexplicable logic, movie itself evokes the feel of a nightmare.

A group of bourgeois people confined in a luxurious villa narrate ghost stories to escape the boredom. What follows then is truly bizarre. Their worst fears assume a form of an unknown entity. They are stalked by this entity for the rest of the movie. This is, in a way, an allegory of incubus- an entity formed by our deepest fears.

The reference to ‘The Nightmare’ is very direct here. Mary is under influence of laudanum drug. She dreams of incubus squatting on her chest and wakes up in trauma. At a point, the painting itself can be seen hanging on a wall. Though the image in the movie closely resembles the painting, the third component of Fuseli’s Nightmarish Triangle is missing.

2. Blue Velvet [1986] | David Lynch

The Nightmare 3

The Lynchian universe operates on nightmarish dimension. It is a dimension where reality distorts, only to create something more real than reality itself.

It may seem incongruous to link David Lynch’s ‘Blue Velvet’ with ‘The Nightmare’ because unlike other examples it isn’t re-enactment per se, but the whole atmosphere of the movie manifests the painting. They both inhibit the same strange world. The contrast between the luminous facade and its dark side is the crucial point in both the works.

Dorothy’s apartment is an archetypal model of Fuseli’s Nightmarish Triangle. Even colour scheme of room bears an uncanny resemblance to painting. In this grotesque scene, Frank imposes himself on Dorothy. The freakishness with which Frank torments Dorothy and passiveness with which she responds to it instantly connects to ‘The Nightmare’.

Here, Frank is an oppressor, the foul-mouthed demon and Dorothy is oppressed, the vulnerable victim. Jeffery is the third element of Fuseli’s Nightmarish Triangle- observer. He is hidden behind the closet, witnessing the act of sexual perversion. It also pertains to the theme of voyeurism.

Must Read – Anatomy of Lynch

3. Borgman [2013] | Alex van Warmerdam

The Nightmare 5

Much like painting, Dutch filmmaker Alex van Warmerdam’s home invasion thriller is obscenely alluring, undeniably ambiguous and wickedly amusing. The movie is about Camiel Borgman and his mysterious hole dwelling cohorts. The contrast between an opulent neighbourhood and encircling dark forest is in a way symbolic to the radiance of lady and evil that surrounds her.

In one of the most disturbing and defining scenes of the movie, Borgman is squatting naked oversleeping Marina, while she is having a nightmare. It is one of the most profound re-enactments of ‘The Nightmare’ on screen. The eccentricity of Borgman’s character and his diabolical nature signify incubus. Marina is, of course, the sleeping lady, and her spouse sleeping beside her-Richard- can be considered passive observer, the horse. [You can read the complete review of Borgman here]

The Nightmare 6

Note that such scene appears multiple times in the movie, which may refer to different versions of ‘The Nightmare’. Interesting thing is, though Borgman arouses longing in Marina, he never engages in a sexual act. He just wants to play. Though ‘The nightmare’ reeks of sexual imposition, it may not be related to sex at all. Well, things are never what they seem to be.

Do you know any other movie references to Fuseli’s ‘The Nightmare’? Let us know in comments.

Also Read: Eadweard: The Man Who Invented Movies

Deloret Imnidian

Deloret Imnidian is a person who wrote this.